Common day-to-day activities we partake in work in forming our digital footprint- the trail of data left when using the internet. Activities such as web searches, online purchases, location data, app usage, and many other components you may not even be aware of are contributing to the formation of our digital footprints. It is important for people to be aware of just how much information we are giving out daily and to be mindful of our digital footprints. As I watched a few TedTalks on privacy on and offline I was shocked by just how much information we give out every single day.
Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Privacy On and Offline
Monday, September 2, 2024
The First Newspaper
The birth of the first newspaper was influenced by several key members of society in the 17th century. The Renaissance which took place from the 14th to the 17th century promoted an increase in demand for written materials and overall information in the growing middle classes who didn't have as much access to information at the time. The earlier invention of the printing press in the 1400's made printing written publications possible for mass production setting the stepping stones for the invention of the newspaper.
Johann Carolus |
From 1618-1648 the Thirty Year's War, a war between Catholic and Protestant states, occurred in central Europe creating a greater need for a means of communication with citizens. This war also led both Catholic and Protestant states to shape public opinion by utilizing printed pamphlets and news sheets.
"Account of All Distinguished and Commemorative News," written in German language was printed in 1605 in Strasbourg France. This was printed by Johann Carolus who obtained a license granting him the ability to be the first to print regular weekly newspapers. Later on in 1659, Carolus published the "Relation" which is recognized as the first newspaper in the world by the World Association of Newspapers.
1609 edition of Carolus's Relation |
In 1695 the Continuation Bill passed without the renewal of the Licensure Act. This allowed copyright and pre-publication censorship to expire. Once press censorship laws were lifted and printing technology advanced newspapers flourished like never before.
Prior to the invention of newspapers people typically received their information through word-of-mouth. This made it difficult to gather information as it only spread so fast resulting in little to no information on important matters. Newspapers revolutionized our means of communication by providing regular printed publications that had the power to rapidly disperse news to a wide range of people. In fact, the concept of "public opinion" stemmed from the introduction of newspapers. Writers were able to express opinions and analyze current events ultimately allowing readers to form their own opinions on topics written about. It became very apparent that newspapers began to influence public opinion and have positively impacted the development of our society. This allowed citizens to become more educated and informed which increased engagement within our government as well as important breakthroughs regarding science, art, economics, and more.
Not only did the newspaper contribute to a new form of communication itself but it was also a precursor for contemporary mass media forms including radios and television sparking inventions in photography as well as other communication technologies.
Wednesday, August 28, 2024
Eight Values of Free Expression
The First Amendment led to The Eight Values of Free Expression which enables citizens to be able to freely express themselves with some restraints. These values include:
2) Participation in Self-government which allows free speech for candidates in elections allowing citizens to make informed decisions on candidates.
3) Stable Change which prevents unnecessary violence allowing citizens to vent their problems ultimately resulting in more stability.
4) Individual Self-fulfilment which allows for free expression ultimately allowing individuals to create their own identities.
5) Check on Governmental Power allows for checks and balances to prevent the abuse of governmental power.
6) Promote Tolerance allows individuals to become more tolerant.
7) Promote Innovation where free speech allows citizens to be more creative allowing for a more diverse and interesting society.
8) Promote Dissent which allows you to disagree with the government and other citizens.
Looking at these freedoms now, it is hard to imagine a time when these freedoms didn't exist. It feels very normal to us now that we have access to these freedoms to freely express ourselves however there was a time when we didn't have these individual liberties. It makes you appreciate all that has occurred in the past to get to a point where we can exercise free expression. While all eight of these values of Free Expression are very important, there are two Values of Free Expression that stuck out to me more than others: stable change and individual self-fulfillment.
Stable Change
Stable change allows citizens to be able to form their own opinions and speak their minds without facing punishment. One may think this could cause unnecessary problems however it actually results in a more stable society with overall less violence. Many individuals act out to get their points across when they don't have the ability to share them openly. Without the freedom to vent their beliefs and issues with the government peacefully, it would result in more destruction and detrimental actions.As discussed in the second Supreme Court video, the Supreme Court Judges cannot bring their own problems to court, they have to wait for the people. This allows for citizens to have a say in the court which would not be allowed without stable change. This method of expression allows individuals to bring attention to their concerns and get them addressed by the court. This is a more successful process than the alternative of citizens acting on their problems which could result in harming others or destruction of property. The process of the Supreme Court allows citizens to have control of what gets addressed in court rather than the government having total control. We as citizens are fortunate to have this power and be able to influence change in our society.
Individual self-fulfillment
I believe that individual self-fulfillment is the most important of all of the Values of Free Expression because it allows you to define who you are as a person. I believe discovering your most authentic self is one of the most important things every individual needs to experience because with no individual identity, who are you as a person? I learn new things about myself every day including new interests, goals, and values, all adding up to the person I am today and will be in the future. The more you learn about yourself the more likely you are to partake in things you enjoy most and ultimately enjoy your own company. The more I reflect on who I am as an individual the more I appreciate life and the experiences I encounter.
This value of expression allows you to be able to do that. Without this value, it would be difficult to form your own identity and reach the self-actualization that Abraham Maslow speaks so highly of. He describes self-actualization as reaching full fulfillment and ultimately living up to our fullest potential which would not be secured without this freedom.
Overall, it allows society to be full of diverse people and allows for differing perspectives and a more interesting lifestyle by learning things from others that you would not learn if people didn't have the ability to express themselves. Without free speech, it would be hard to express yourself and therefore learn the important things about who you are to form your own identity.
Tuesday, August 27, 2024
The U.S. Supreme Court Reflection
The two U.S. Supreme Court videos were very enlightening. The first video taught me some general information covering the nine justices; each of which serves an average of sixteen years or longer, the history of the Supreme Court, the amount of cases the court receives weekly, and yearly, and a look into the day-to-day work of the justices.
I liked how the video began by diving into the history of the Supreme Court addressing the case of Marbury v. Madison, 1803, where under John Marshall the court struck down an act of Congress as unconstitutional. This was very monumental as the new court rapidly earned public respect as a co-equal branch of government under his years. The video then continues onto the case of Dred Scott claiming his freedom under an act of Congress twenty years later which weakened the Court's authority.
Through the conversation with Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor, Thomas, and Breyer talking with Dick Howard, the Justices noted some interesting points. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor shared that the process for granting or denying certiorari requires every petition to get the same individual consideration. This shows that the process is fair and unbiased towards any particular group of people. I also appreciated how the associate Justice mentioned his system of everyone speaking once before anyone speaks twice. I feel like that is an excellent system because it can be hard to get your opinion out there in a conversation when the same few people keep talking. I think this system allows for equal conversations accounting for everyone's opinions and ideas. Justice Clarence Thomas mentioned that he likes to have an outlined answer before coming into the conference to know how he is going to decide the case but sometimes that answer changes throughout the conference. He acknowledges that his opinion relatively stays the same yet he is open to changing his opinion based on the discussion. Each of these points makes me feel confident in the individuals making these decisions as they are attempting to make fair and ethical decisions.
I was particularly surprised by the number of cases received compared to the number considered by the court. The Supreme Court receives over a hundred new cases every week and about 7,000 a year, most of these arriving as petitions for certiorari. Of the approximate 7,000, the court only accepts about a hundred of them for full consideration each year. Newly arrived petitions and written arguments in cases that have already been accepted are sent to the justices one time a week. This surprised me because I thought a hundred was very few compared to the thousands of cases received yearly. However, once watching the second video I slowly realized why.
Part two dove into the inner workings of the cases and how they go through the Court. Within a few days after hearing arguments, the nine Justices sit together in a conference room to vote to decide a case. Once they decide, a Justice on the majority side of the decision is assigned to write an opinion explaining the legal reasons for the decision. This is important because the Court's reasoning in a written opinion binds all other courts as they decide future cases. Any Justice also has the option to write a separate opinion from the majority, either dissenting from the decision or concurring with the result but disagreeing with the reasoning which I did not know prior to this video. It takes about four weeks for the opinion drafts to be completed and then it is sent to all nine Justices. A Justice may redraft in an effort to persuade the other Justices to join the majority opinion. Revisions may go on for months as the author tries to accommodate differing views.
I found it interesting how the length of the written opinion varies. When the decisions are unanimous it will typically be a few pages long but if the divided court writes separate opinions it can exceed eighty pages. This makes complete sense though it's crazy to think that if a separate opinion is written it can more than double in length.
After learning about the process it makes sense why they only choose to accept about a hundred for full consideration. Doing any more would be very difficult to manage with the amount of time it takes to just come to a decision on one case. This video made me realize just how long it takes to grant or deny certiorari and made me respect the work of the Supreme Court Justices even more than I had before. I found it interesting how a Justice explained how it takes at least three to five years to start feeling less overwhelmed and getting comfortable in the position. It makes sense that it would take a decent amount of time to get comfortable in such an important role but also surprising that out of the average sixteen years as a Justice, it takes about a fourth of the time to actually start feeling confident.
Wednesday, August 21, 2024
Top Five Sources of New and Information
Final Blog Post: My Relationship with Technology
Technology has dramatically shifted from basic inventions to advanced devices and machines which are now a part of our daily lives that we c...
-
After exploring two anti-war voice websites, I noticed how strong these anti-war voices were being used, though I've never seen or heard...
-
With the continuous rise of technology, gathering information is easier than ever. Through the access of various media platforms obtaining k...
-
In 2002, the New York Times reported that the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) was developing a tracking system called ...